Wednesday, January 30, 2008

Is G-d The Only Source Of Objective Morality?

In this post I mentioned the philosophical problem that implicit in any legal or moral system that is predicated on Divine commands. In essence, a Divine command can only be binding if there is some outside force that binds us. In other words, there must be normative reason why we are obligated to follow G-d's will that exists independent of His will.

A little over a year ago, the Jblog world was abuzz about an article by Rabbi Avi Shafran where he claimed that without G-d we "have no reason to believe in objective categories of good and evil." He argued that absent G-d the world would be


"a place where the very concepts of morality and ethics are rendered meaningless, a world view in which a thieving, philandering, serial murdering cannibal is no less commendable a member of the species than a selfless, hard-working philanthropist."

In other words, without G-d there is no objective morality and everything is a free-for-all.

This argument relies on three important assumptions:

1) That we are capable of determining the content of that morality (the epistemic assumption).
2) That the content of that morality is "better" than any subjective morality (the metaphysical assumption).
3) That we are bound by that objective morality (the normative assumption).

These three assumptions are crucial. If there is an objective morality, but we have no means of learning our duties, then objective morality is useless and we are no better off than if morality was purely subjective. We wouldn't have any way of knowing if killing an infant is objectively good or bad. Furthermore, G-d's objective morality must really be more moral than any system of subjective ethics or it serves no purpose. It might be wrong to kill infants because G-d said so, but so what? It might also be wrong to kill infants because any random person came up with a system of morality. The objectivity of the system is only valuable if it leads to more moral results. Otherwise who cares if morals are objective or subjective?

Moreover, even if objective morality exists and we can discover that objective morality, we must be bound by that morality. If we can choose whether to be bound by that morality, we are no better off than if morality was subjective. Anyone can do whatever he wants.

I posted about this debate when it first happened, and my argument focused on the first assumption. There I argued that even if objective moral principles exist, man must apply to them to real situations and since reasonable people can disagree over how to apply these principles, objective morality is never completely objective. We can never really know what objective morality demands.

Notwithstanding the validity of that argument, I wish to challenge the third assumption here. Let me unpack its hidden premises a little more. The argument that only G-d can create an objective (and therefore meaningful) morality presupposes that we are bound by that Divine morality. It also assumes that moral duties can only exist if they are universal: they must apply to and bind everyone. What does it mean to say that an action is "good" or "bad"? "Good" actions are the ones that uphold a moral duty, "bad" actions are the ones that violate that duty. We have a duty not to murder infants and also a duty to help the poor. People who murder infants violate the former, while charity givers follow the latter.

But in what sense is a person violating a duty if he isn't obligated by it? Am I violating a duty to believe that Jesus is our savior? Or to kill infidels? The fact that a system exists which designates moral categories is meaningless unless I am obligated to follow that system.

So if I am not bound by G-d's moral system, then there is no objective morality in any nontrivial sense. There might be a system that claims to be objective, but so what? Hitler was only wrong (in Rabbi Shafran's view) because he violated his objective moral duty not to kill innocent humans. But if he wasn't bound by that duty, how could he be "wrong?" In that case, morality is inherently subjective in the sense that we are free to choose our moral obligations. If I am not bound by G-d's objective morality, then I can choose my personal subjective morality. So Rabbi Shafran's argument clearly presupposes that we are bound by some independent objective morality that exists apart from G-d's command or else we wouldn't be violating G-d's morality.

Perhaps one could respond that if the epistemic and metaphysical assumptions are correct, then objective morality is actually more moral, and we have an obligation to be moral. But what is the source of that obligation? If we aren't bound by G-d's morality, what obligation do we have to be moral? Some independent objective morality must exist that does not depend on G-d.

So Rabbi Shafran's argument is actually turned on its head. Rather than proving that objective, meaningful morality can only exist because of G-d, it actually presupposes that an independent morality exists without G-d! Without that independent morality, there can exist no useful, G-d given, objective morality. The argument fails on its own premises.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

10. uggs outlet Pink bra? Sure! White tank top? Sure! Brewers heels? Sure! These girls don't care what they look like, they only care that they are wearing clothes and that those clothes are covering their naughty parts (but not too much, wink wink.). http://www.morenorthface.com For those days that are obviously more formal, you might want to consider picking up a three-piece suit, such as this pinstriped ensemble from Simon Spurr. http://www.wellnorthface.com I believe shopping at Nordstrom is worth it because the prices are not that bad and the sales are very good.. ghd australia Cut a stripe of felt to your desired size for the front piece of the headband.

Anonymous said...

So while we're off dreaming up new places to go, we thought we'd take this week to share a few of our favorite field trips from the past. north face uk Through it article I might a little as though to educate yourself regarding take going to be the a period of time to explore reveal everything that all your family not only can they be capable of getting so that you have going to be the MLM Launch Formula and lunch break to the ground just for too much time I think the idea if you have been a minimum of one to do with the best training so many more for more information regarding before be the case what in the network marketing industry this year and enchanting a number of more decades to understand more about are offered.. http://www.softuggboots.com When I was there I found lots of amazing fabrics that were in the 1 metre to 3 metre range. ghd BOTB the Dark Bralette: is definitely a must have because it makes your boobs happy. http://www.oneghdhair.com 1.

Anonymous said...

You have to know all those hats before you delegate anything to anyone else.". ghd pure She did a simple dance and got up on her tippy toes, as seen on the video above.. uggs canada Su Yi-wrapped, three thousand black hair wind moving, exuberant of Yu Zhi micro Jan Smart of sound both out. ugg slippers All leading brands like 3.1 Phillip Lim, Tommy Hilfiger and Calvin Klein embrace pastel shades like lilac, pale pick and blues. ghd australia In fact, this is the perfect time, go ahead and purchase some new snaps, watches and hats for that new look..

Anonymous said...

The contractor says that by Friday noon the work will be completed, that is all parts of the bridge will be in place. north face backpacks The Lithuanian-based app store (with offices in the UK and Silicon Valley as well) was founded in 2004, and recently announced it has reached 3 million downloads per day, and a total of over 1 billion downloads to date. north face outlet It includes handbags, purses, boots, shoes, etc. http://www.wellnorthface.com Two elements were key to Machinima building that following - first, its approach to platforms, focusing exclusively on YouTube instead of diversifying. ghd rare leopard edition Whatever your standard is ,we can always find the right one to satisfies your appetite ,we have the confidence that you will love this brand the famous starship and thousands of people like you ,never say no before you really come into our online shop and have a look at the beautifully designed handbags ,your praise will be always our expect ,we want to make everyone like this brand and be a member of mulberry handbags family ,with your effort I believe mulberry will always walk in front of fashion.

Anonymous said...

Next I meet with the director to see his vision for the film. ghds It a red letter day in Knittingland. http://www.verynorthface.com Stella McCartney: A former student of Central Saint Martins in London, Stella McCartney had a start in the fashion world many would dream of. ghd hair straighteners He doesn't have a clue about everything. ugg Doing this needs a software, from which occasion this company sends in a variety of styles and the necessary costs.